Winding Up Petitions & Disputed Debt

winding up petition disputed debt

Can a winding up petition be presented when debt is disputed?

The winding up of a company is a legal process that leads to its dissolution. This procedure is typically initiated by a creditor through a winding-up petition when a company fails to pay a debt.

However, the intersection of winding up petitions and disputed debts introduces a complex legal scenario. Disputes over the validity of, or amount of, a debt raise significant questions about the appropriateness and legality of pursuing a company’s winding up under such circumstances.

Can a winding-up petition can be presented where the underlying debt is disputed by the company?

Understanding the dynamics of the UK legal framework and the potential outcomes of presenting a winding-up petition in relation to disputed debt is crucial for both creditors contemplating this course of action and companies facing the threat of compulsory liquidation amidst financial disagreements.

Understanding Winding Up Petitions

A winding-up petition is a court document filed by a creditor or, less commonly, by the company itself, seeking to have the company compulsorily wound up or liquidated by the court.

This drastic measure is often considered the last resort in debt recovery efforts, signalling that the creditor believes the debtor company is unable to meet its financial obligations.

The process starts with the petition being served on the company, followed by – ultimately – a court hearing to decide the company’s fate.

If the court makes the usual winding-up order, it leads to the appointment of a liquidator to sell the company’s assets and distribute the proceeds among its creditors.

It is also commonplace for the petitioning creditor in winding up proceedings to have served a statutory demand prior to presenting a winding up petition. Serving a statutory demand for payment of the debt usually allows winding up proceedings to be commenced 21 days after service of the demand (if the debt has not been paid in that time).

Debt Disputes

Debt disputes arise when there is disagreement over the existence, validity, or amount of a debt claimed by a creditor. Such disputes can stem from various issues, including discrepancies in the delivery or quality of goods and services, errors in billing or contract terms, and disagreements over the terms of repayment.

The presence of a dispute fundamentally affects the creditor’s actions.

In the context of winding up petitions, the legitimacy of the debt becomes a central concern. Creditors are generally advised against pursuing a winding up petition if the debt is genuinely disputed on substantial grounds.

This is because the winding up process is not intended as a means to collect contested debts but rather as a mechanism to deal with insolvent companies that cannot pay their undisputed debts.

What constitutes genuine and substantial grounds will depend on the context of the case. It was stated by the Court in Re A Company No.0012209 [1992] 1WLR 351 that “A dispute will not be “substantial” if it has really no rational prospect of success.”

In the same case, the Court went on to state that, “A dispute will not be put forward in good faith if the company is merely seeking to take for itself credit which it is not allowed under the contract.”


Legal Framework Governing Disputed Debts and Winding Up Petitions

The UK legal system provides a structured approach to handling winding up petitions in cases involving disputed debts.

A seminal principle is that a winding up petition should not be used as a tool for debt recovery in cases where the debt’s existence  is disputed.

The High Court in Re a Company stated:

“It must also be remembered that, from a legal point of view, winding up petitions are not meant to be debt collecting exercises for individual creditors. They are meant to be a mechanism for putting a debtor who is insolvent into a collective form of insolvency proceedings for the benefit of all its creditors and, if applicable, other stakeholders.” 

The court’s role is not to adjudicate the dispute, but to determine whether the company is unable to pay its debts. Therefore, if a company provides evidence of a bona fide dispute over the debt, the court is likely to dismiss the petition or, is the petition is yet to be presented, to grant the company injunctive relief by ordering that the creditor be restrained from presenting a winding up petition.

Furthermore, if the company can demonstrate solvency apart from the disputed debt, this further increases the prospects of the petition being dismissed, or the injunction being granted.

The emphasis is on protecting companies from being unjustly wound up over debts that are not unequivocally owed.

Practical Considerations and Risks

Serving a winding up petition based on a debt that is disputed carries significant risks for creditors. Firstly, if the court deems the petition to be an abuse of process due to the existence of a substantial dispute, the creditor may be liable for the costs of the petition and potentially face damages for wrongful use of the winding up procedure. This can turn a debt recovery effort into a costly mistake.

For the company, the mere filing of a winding up petition, even if ultimately dismissed, can have severe repercussions. It may damage the company’s reputation, lead to loss of business, and if made public, trigger a run on the company’s finances by other creditors.

This underscores the need for creditors to exercise caution and consider alternative debt recovery methods when facing a disputed debt.

Moreover, the process of disputing a winding up petition can be resource-intensive for the debtor company. It requires legal representation and the gathering of evidence to demonstrate the dispute’s validity, in addition to proving the company’s solvency. These considerations highlight the complexities and potential pitfalls involved in winding up proceedings in the context of disputed debts.

Resolving Disputed Debts Before Winding Up

Resolving disputed debts before escalating to a winding up petition is in the best interests of both parties. Mediation and arbitration offer viable alternatives, providing a structured environment for negotiating a settlement. These dispute resolution mechanisms can help avoid the financial and reputational damage associated with winding up proceedings.

Legal advice is crucial for resolving these situations. A solicitor specialising in commercial debt can offer strategies for dispute resolution and provide guidance on the feasibility and risks of pursuing a winding up petition.

Engaging in dialogue and seeking an amicable resolution can often save time, resources, and preserve business relationships, making it a preferable path over litigation and compulsory liquidation.

How can South Bank Legal assist?

If you are a creditor seeking payment of unpaid debts, our commercial debt recovery solicitors can guide you through the process of presenting a winding up petition or statutory demand.

We can provide advice and assistance on issuing a winding up petition when debt is disputed.

If you are the director of a company served with a winding up petition, our dispute resolution solicitors will advise you on how to defend the company whilst giving you pragmatic and commercially aware advice.

Our insolvency and bankruptcy solicitors advise on:

For a confidential discussion with South Bank Legal, please get in touch using the form below or call us on 02035765179.


Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.